White scenery @showyou, hatena

If you have any comments, you may also send twitter @shsub or @showyou.

WiMAXがやってきた

早速我が家で測定。http://speedtest.goo.ne.jp/flash.htm使用。

WiMAX(D01NA)

一方で今まで使ってるemobile(D25HW)

ぶっちゃけた話、WiMAXすげー、はやーい っていうより、


emobile遅くなりすぎ


2年前は1.8~2Mbpsくらいでたんだけどなぁ。
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/showyou/20080212/1202818293


あと明らかに接続してて反応が違う。。

WiMAX

PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=88.360 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=92.521 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=92.270 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=91.861 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=91.628 ms



PING yahoo.com (209.191.122.70): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.191.122.70: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=248.639 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.122.70: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=247.736 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.122.70: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=252.404 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.122.70: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=247.234 ms
64 bytes from 209.191.122.70: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=247.090 ms

emobile

PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.99): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 66.249.89.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=56 time=47.298 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=56 time=67.191 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=56 time=66.675 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=56 time=66.306 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=56 time=165.812 ms


PING yahoo.com (98.137.149.56): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 98.137.149.56: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=237.626 ms
64 bytes from 98.137.149.56: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=187.747 ms
64 bytes from 98.137.149.56: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=187.540 ms
64 bytes from 98.137.149.56: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=199.093 ms
64 bytes from 98.137.149.56: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=186.719 ms

あら、pingemobileの方が早い。
ただemobilepingを始めるときに若干時間かかってんだよなぁ。名前解決のせい?(8.8.8.8は使ってない)

WiMAX

time nslookup www.google.com
Server: 119.107.200.151
Address: 119.107.200.151#53



Non-authoritative answer:
www.google.com canonical name = www.l.google.com.
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.104
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.99


real 0m0.384s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.021s

emobile

Server: 192.168.1.1
Address: 192.168.1.1#53



Non-authoritative answer:
www.google.com canonical name = www.l.google.com.
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.104
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.99



real 0m2.334s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.009s

D25HWの名前解決が遅いのはDNSをD25HW自身で解決してるからかなぁ。ping自体は悪くないみたい。


おまけ 家

PING www.l.google.com (66.249.89.104): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=7.638 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=8.048 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=8.957 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=7.599 ms
64 bytes from 66.249.89.104: icmp_seq=4 ttl=52 time=7.703 ms



Server: *.*.*.1
Address: *.*.*.*#53


Non-authoritative answer:
www.google.com canonical name = www.l.google.com.
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.99
Name: www.l.google.com
Address: 66.249.89.104



real 0m0.070s
user 0m0.004s
sys 0m0.008s